Legal Opinion
Romeo J. Roy, Inc. v. Northern National Bank
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 7, 1984No. Nos. 83-1743, 83-1753 and 83-1765PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The instant appeal is a consolidation of two cases from the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine, 32 B.R. 240, 31 B.R. 770. Complaints were filed in the bankruptcy court after the expiration of the stay of judgment in Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50, 102 S.Ct. 2858, 73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982). The bankruptcy court dismissed the cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The United States District Court for the District of Maine, 32 B.R. 1008, 32 B.R. 1012, affirmed on the ground that Local Rule 41, the emergency rule providing for continued…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In Re South Portland Shipyard & Marine Railways Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1983
- Romeo J. Roy, Inc. v. Northern National Bank (In Re Romeo J. Roy, Inc.)District Court, D. Maine · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lombard-Wall Inc. v. New York City Housing Development Corp. (In Re Lombard-Wall Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Michael MacMann v. J.R. Titus, in His Capacity as Commander of the South Weymouth Naval Air Station, a Facility of the United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Precon, Inc. v. JRS Realty Trust (In Re Brown)District Court, D. Maine · 1985
- In Re Romeo Roy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Freudenmann v. Drainage District 2 (In Re Freudenmann)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1987