Legal Opinion
Simecek v. UNITED STATES NAT. BANK OF OMAHA, NEB.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1937No. 10834, 10835PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Circuit Judge.
Both these cases arose out of the same general transaction; they were consolidated for trial, and are presented here on one record and bill of exceptions. At the close of appellants’ evidence the court, sustaining motions by appellee for directed verdicts, entered the judgments of dismissal here complained of on the ground of want of jurisdiction.
Both appellants in their petitions claim damages for losses suffered as victims of a conspiracy to defraud them and others. The evidence in brief tends to establish the following facts: Both appellants were subscribers for…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wetmore v. RymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Bullard v. City of CiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hunter v. United Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- York v. Guaranty Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Sparks v. EnglandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Opal May Alberty v. Western Surety Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. WertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.