Legal Opinion

Chien v. Ransom

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 23, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2017-2334Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDREW CHIEN, pro se, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 17-2334 (CKK) UNITED STATES, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (September 23, 2019) Presently before this Court is a [38] Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants The United States of America (the “United States”) and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).1 Defendants move to dismiss pro se Plaintiff’s [29] First Amended Complaint, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), on grounds that this Court does not have jurisdiction over the causes of…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API