Davis Carruth v. Valley Mercantile, Etc., Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLEY, J.
This suit was brought by plaintiffs (appellants) against Frank Boyer, the Valley Mercantile & Banking Company (hereinafter called company), and Ruth Livesay, to recover damages for breach of contract.
Plaintiffs alleged, among other things, that Boyer was indebted to said company, and in order to protect it against loss through possible decline of the market, defendant Livesay, as its agent, procured plaintiffs to enter into a contract to buy 20 bales of Boyer’s cotton, which 20 bales of cotton plaintiffs themselves sold and| bound themselves to deliver to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. ParksNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. F. Reisch & Bros.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Jaffe v. DeckardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Territory of New Mexico v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
- Corcoran v. Albuquerque Traction Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Hamilton v. DotyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Frank Bond & Son, Inc. v. Reserve Minerals Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928
- Porter v. OrtizNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.