Legal Opinion
Amann v. Office of the Utah Attorney General
District Court, D. Utah
Decided September 30, 2024No. 2:18-cv-00341Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH PAUL G. AMANN, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, PARTIAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART v. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR OFFICE OF THE UTAH ATTORNEY SUMMARY JUDGMENT GENERAL, SEAN REYES, BRIDGET ROMANO, and TYLER GREEN, in their Case No. 2:18-cv-00341-JNP-DAO official and individual capacities, District Judge Jill N. Parrish Defendants. Through this action, Plaintiff Paul G. Amann asserts a number of claims against the Office of the Utah Attorney General (“the AG’s Office”)…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.