Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 31, 1993No. 93-0381-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Dean Allen appeals a judgment of conviction and sentence imposed for first-degree intentional homicide. Allen argues that the ten-month delay between the time of his conviction and his sentencing violated his right to a speedy trial, guaranteed by the sixth amendment to the United States Constitution 1 and applicable to state criminal proceedings by virtue of the fourteenth amendment. Although we conclude that a defendant's right to a speedy trial encompasses the time from which the person is accused to the time of sentencing, we do not agree that Allen's right to speedy sentencing was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Wayne Paul Burkett v. Richard Cunningham, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  5. Filimon Castillo Perez v. George E. Sullivan, Warden, and Attorney General, State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TodiscoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. State Ex Rel. Hager v. MartenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. GreenColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Jolly v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API