McTernan v. Berryhill
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PATRICIA MCTERNAN, Case No. 18-cv-07036-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 10 ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 14, 21 Defendant. 11 12 The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment in this Social Security appeal. 13 The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) made several errors in discounting the opinions of a 14 number of medical professionals. Based upon my review of the parties’ papers and the 15 administrative record, I GRANT plaintiff Patricia McTernan’s motion, DENY defendant’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Karen Garrison v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.