Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
In their first assignment of error, defendant Pinelawn challenges the testimony of plaintiff Clara Mae Hill that crypt “D” was the subject of negotiations between plaintiffs and defendant Pinelawn. *236Pinelawn asserts this testimony violated the parol evidence rule and should have been excluded at trial. However, Pinelawn overlooks the fact that a defense witness, Charles Lynn, testified that in the ordinary course of business a crypt designation would have been assigned to the Family Protection Agreement by the office administrator after it was signed by the plaintiffs. In light…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Carl Rose & Sons Ready Mix Concrete, Inc. v. Thorp Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Carroll v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Carroll v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Metropolitan Furniture Leasing, Inc. v. HorneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Marcoin, Inc. v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981