Legal Opinion
Shotts v. Hugh
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 4, 1976No. 49686PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice.
This case presents important questions as to the proper functions of this state through public trusts formed by the authority of 60 O.S.1971 § 176 et seq, Trusts for Furtherance of Public Functions. § 176 Provides in pertinent part:
“(a) Express trusts may be created in real or personal property, or either or both, or in any estate or interest in either or both, with the state, or any county, municipality, political or governmental subdivision, or governmental agency of the state as the beneficiary thereof by the: (1) express approval of the Governor if the State of Oklahoma or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. WarramSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- New Jersey Mortgage Finance Agency v. McCraneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Shipp v. Southeastern Oklahoma Industries AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1972
- Morris v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. HatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Application of GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- John R. Grubb, Inc. v. Iowa Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Application of Fun Country Develop. AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Application of GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Opinion No. (1979), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.