Legal Opinion

Homer v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1909No. 1739PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Accusation of larceny, from city court of Leesburg — Judge Long. December 9, 1908.

1Opinion of the CourtKussell, J.

The defendant was convicted in the city court of Leesburg of the offense of simple larceny; and he excepts to the overruling of his motion for a new trial. In the bill of exceptions he assigns error on exceptions pendente lite to the refusal of his request, made at the close of the evidence, that the judge write out and read the charge of the court to the jury. The judge certifies that the reason the request was not granted was that he did not have time to write out the charge. Since, in our view, a reversal is required on this ground, it is unnecessary to consider any other assignment of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fry v. SheheeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Wheatley & Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Moyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Ashley-Price Lumber Co. v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Brindle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Forrester v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API