Brindle v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
■ Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Floyd county— Judge Reece. September 21, 1915;
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, C. J.
The provisions of section 1056 of the Penal Code are not complied with by directing the official'stenographer of the court to take down, in the course of the trial and as delivered to the jury, the oral utterances of the judge in his charge. Of course, the judge may, for his own convenience, dictate to the stenographer what he intends to read to the jury, and have it transcribed, so that he can read it, but the charge must be reduced to a legible condition and placed in a form in which it can be “known and read of all men,” before the judge delivers it by reading it to the jury. In most cases…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowden v. AchorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Wheatley & Co. v. WestSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
- Homer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. RiniSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- McRae v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Sherwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Fletcher v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938