Legal Opinion

United States v. Corbetta

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 27, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYAN, District Judge.

This is a suit by the United States to recover from the defendants, from May 17, 1945, the sum of $98,982.06 together with 6% interest thereon, this amount representing the difference between $175,000 allegedly ascertained to be excess profits earned by them for the year 1942, pursuant to Section 403(c) of the Renegotiation Act, as amended 50 Appendix U.S.C.A. § 1191, and $76,017.94 allegedly ascertained to be tax credit due the defendants therefor under Section 3806 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3806.

In essence, the defense herein rests on three grounds:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Mfg. Co. United States v. Philmac Sportwear, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. CorbettaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  3. United States v. Scandia Mfg. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
  4. United States v. MitchellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  5. Whitaker v. SheikhDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API