Legal Opinion

Heller v. Heller

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1964No. Civ. 21699PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This is an appeal by defendant husband from a minute order dated June 6, 1963, awarding plaintiff attorney fees and expenses in this action, and a formal order dated June 12, 1963, directing him to pay certain sums to plaintiff wife as provided for in the property settlement agreement of the parties. Defendant argues that both orders must be reversed because the court exceeded its jurisdiction and erroneously interpreted the agreement. Plaintiff argues that the trial court acted within its jurisdiction and properly construed the agreement and that, in any event, the appeal must be dismissed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Plumer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Spreckels v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Grant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Edward C. Bell v. Richard D. HongistoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. In Re BlazeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Biagi v. BiagiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. County of Alameda v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Garrett v. GarrettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API