Legal Opinion

Sokoloff v. Corinto Steamship Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 5, 1969No. 69-161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant, defendant in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse summary judgment in an action to collect on a promissory note. He urges as points on appeal a breach of oral warranties and a failure of consideration for the execution of the promissory note. We find no error in the judgment here under review.

The four written agreements involved in the transaction out of which the promissory note arose, indicate that a vessel was sold “as is, where is”, which clearly excluded any oral representation or warranties as to the performance capabilities of the vessel. Yanish v. Fernandez, 156…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holbrook v. Capital Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Holbrook v. Capital Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Findley v. Downing Motors Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Biro v. GeiserSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  5. Yanish v. FernandezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Doyle v. MaruszczakDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API