Legal Opinion
Newton v. Kenific Group
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 15, 2014No. Civil Action No. WMN-14-1532PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM M. NICKERSON, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. ECF No. 12. The motion is fully briefed. Upon consideration of the pleadings and applicable law, the Court determines that no hearing is necessary, Local Rule 105.6, and that Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss will be denied.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Joshua Newton alleges that Defendant, the Kenific Group, did not fulfill its promise of employment and brings this action to recover damages arising from his reliance on the proffered…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Brockington v. BoykinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Aldabe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Doe v. Catholic Relief ServicesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2021
- Selective Insurance Company of South Carolina v. Assisted Living Well Compassionate Care LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025