Charles S. Barker Express Golf, Inc. v. Golf U.S.A., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentHeaney, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. As a preliminary matter, I believe that Missouri law, rather than Oklahoma law, applies. “Federal district courts must apply the choice of law rules of the state in which they sit when jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship.” Whirlpool Corp. v. Ritter, 929 F.2d 1318, 1320 (8th Cir.1991) (citing Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 496, 61 S.Ct. 1020, 85 L.Ed. 1477 (1941)). We review de novo the district court’s determination of which state’s law to apply. See Salve Regina College v. Russell, 499 U.S. 225, 230, 111 S.Ct. 1217, 113 L.Ed.2d 190 (1991).
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Whirlpool Corp. v. RitterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- High Life Sales Co. v. Brown-Forman Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.