City of Schenectady v. Schenectady Railway Co.
New York Supreme Court
Motion to vacate a preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the CourtBorst, J.
The plaintiff is a city of the second class and subject to the provisions of uniform charters of second-class cities. The defendant is a street railway corporation. An ordinance recently enacted by the city provides that “ Every car or other vehicle running upon a street railway track or tracks, and operated by electricity or otherwise, on which passengers are carried, shall be manned by both a motorman and a conductor * * * in order to secure the convenience and safety of the public in the operation of said cars.” The defendant recently has commenced operating what are known as “ one-man…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1892
- People Ex Rel. C.P., Etc., R.R. Co. v. . WillcoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- People Ex Rel. Ross v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- City of Troy v. . United Traction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Des Moines City Railway Co. v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street & Electric Railway EmployeesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- Third Avenue Railway Co. v. GodleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930