Legal Opinion
Molina v. Pacer Cartage, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided September 15, 2014No. Case No. 13cv2344-LAB (JMA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT BRIEFING; AND
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND
LARRY ALAN BURNS, District Judge.
After Defendant Pacer Cartage removed this putative class action from state court, Plaintiff Manuela Mendoza moved to remand. Later, Edwin Molina was substituted in as named Plaintiff, and therefore replaces Mendoza as movant. Pacer later asked the Court to consider a supplemental response.
The unopposed motion for leave to file a supplemental response (Docket no. 13) is GRANTED. The Court will consider it along with the other briefing on the issue of remand.
Removal
Under…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Antonio Abrego Abrego v. The Dow Chemical Co Shell Oil Company, D/B/A Shell Chemical Company, and Shell Agricultural Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- United Investors Life Insurance Company v. Waddell & Reed Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oakley v. Domino's Pizza LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021