Boyesen v. Heidelbrecht
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Jefferson county. Tried below before Bush, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Irvine, C.
This was an action by Boyesen, claiming as a purchaser for value, before maturity, of a note made by Heidelbrech't to the Warder, Bushnell & Glessner Company. The defense was that the note was one of three given in payment for a harvesting machine; that, the machine had been sold with a warranty; that by the terms of the contract, if the machine failed to comply with the warranty, it might, under certain conditions, be returned and the contract rescinded; that the machine did not comply with the warranty, the conditions had been complied with, the machine returned and the contract…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C. Aultman & Co. v. ReamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Dern v. KelloggNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Omaha & Republican Valley Railway Co. v. HallNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Standiford v. M. H. Green & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1898
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haslam v. BargeNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Larsen v. SanzieriNebraska Supreme Court · 1909