Legal Opinion
Marchand v. Simonson
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided April 28, 2014No. Case No. 11-cv-348 (TLM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
TUCKER L. MELANQON, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’, Erik Simonson (“Simonson”), the City of Willi-mantic (“Willimantic”), and the Town of Windham (“Windham”) (collectively, the “defendants”), Motion for Summary Judgment [Rec. Doc. 167],1 requesting summary judgment on all of plaintiff Gregg Marchand’s (“Marchand” or the “plaintiff’) claims, and plaintiffs opposition thereto *103[Rec. Doc. 170]. For the reasons set forth below, defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment will be granted in part and denied in part.
1. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff commenced this civil rights action…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Chase v. Nodine's Smokehouse, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Cucuta v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Anthony Sanseverino v. Darrius Conaway, Jakub Majewski, and John PrisavageDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Armstrong v. MartocchioDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Boyd v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.