Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 1990PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Wallach, J.

This conviction for robbery and larceny must be reversed because in the course of the trial prejudicial evidence was received against defendant pertaining to a prior robbery attempt, which was then improperly utilized to demonstrate defendant’s propensity to commit the crime with which he was charged (People v Fiore, 34 NY2d 81; see, People v Molineux, 168 NY 264).

The People’s case established, to the evident satisfaction of the jury, that at about 8:45 a.m. on the morning of December 11, 1987, Michelle Saferstein entered the IRT subway station at 103rd Street…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. AllweissNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. LARKINS, RONALD J., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. People v. BlakeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API