Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Reyes-Santiago

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided September 23, 2015No. 12-2372PPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBarron, Circuit Judge

I fully join the majority’s persuasive analysis save for one part, regarding sentencing, where I see things somewhat differently.

I

The defendant, Reyes, contends that he has been treated disparately in sentencing from his co-conspirators for no good reason. And the majority is understandably troubled — as am I — that he was.

Reyes points to the fact that a number of his co-conspirators stipulated in their plea agreements — as he did in his — to a relatively small amount of drugs. But while those co-conspirators were sentenced on the basis of those stipulated quantities, the District Court…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Ayala-VazquezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Sevilla-OyolaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API