Legal Opinion

Fall v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 9, 1923No. 24,563PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was to recover a commission for the purchase of real estate. Trial was to a jury. Plaintiff recovered, and defendant appeals.

Plaintiff alleges in his petition:

“That during all of the times material hereto, plaintiff was the agent of the defendant with authority and instructions to purchase land in Colorado for the *714defendant, the defendant orally agreeing to pay the plaintiff the sum of one dollar per acre as commission for such land as plaintiff procured and which should be accepted by defendant. Acting under said agreement,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grimes v. EmerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Smith v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Marsh v. KendallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Smith v. HansonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Citizens' Bank of Garnett v. BowenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaiser v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  2. DeYoung v. ReilingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Farmers State Bank v. CrowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Young v. NewboldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API