Legal Opinion

State v. Shultz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 31, 1975No. 57668PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

Defendant appeals his conviction by jury and sentence for breaking and entering in violation of § 708.8, The Code. Although we find no merit in four of his five assignments, of error, we reverse and remand because we agree with his contention the trial court erred in allowing police identification tags to be taken into the jury room.

The Northside Fruit and Grocery in Ames was equipped with a “silent” burglar alarm. When activated by a forced entry of the store, it would not ring there but would ring at the Ames police station. At 4:33 a. m. on Easter Sunday, April 14, 1974,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  2. State v. KittelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. State v. BranchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. State v. RobinetteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  5. Meade v. RollerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. NowlinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  2. State v. FuhrmannSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  4. State v. GallupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API