Legal Opinion
State v. Gallup
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 19, 1993No. 92-17PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
The jury in this case convicted the defendant of two crimes: delivery of a controlled substance and distribution of a taxable substance without a drug tax stamp. See Iowa Code §§ 204.401(l)(b)(5), 421A.12 (1991). 1 Because the defendant was an habitual offender, the district court enhanced the sentence. See Iowa Code §§ 902.8, 902.9(2).
On appeal from these convictions, the defendant raises four issues. First, the district court erred in overruling his motions for a judgment of acquittal because the State failed to disprove the defendant’s defense of entrapment. Second, the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. McKettrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Dennis v. PoppelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Lee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.