Legal Opinion

Pate v. City Council of Tuscaloosa

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided March 5, 1993No. 2910628PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a zoning case.

In March 1990, Luther S. Pate IV sued the City Council of Tuscaloosa (City Council), requesting that the trial court declare § 35-105(B) of the zoning ordinance of Tuscaloosa (the 1986 ordinance) invalid. Specifically, Pate claimed that the 1986 ordinance, as it prohibited the construction of new off-site billboards in certain restricted areas, was not in furtherance of Ala. Code 1975, § 11-52-72, and that certain provisions of the 1986 ordinance had been enforced arbitrarily and capriciously, while other provisions were not enforced.

Pate later amended his complaint by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Olympia Spa v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. McCollum v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. City of Tuscaloosa v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Mobile v. WeinackerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. City of Mobile v. WeinackerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  4. Duncan v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API