Pate v. City Council of Tuscaloosa
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is a zoning case.
In March 1990, Luther S. Pate IV sued the City Council of Tuscaloosa (City Council), requesting that the trial court declare § 35-105(B) of the zoning ordinance of Tuscaloosa (the 1986 ordinance) invalid. Specifically, Pate claimed that the 1986 ordinance, as it prohibited the construction of new off-site billboards in certain restricted areas, was not in furtherance of Ala. Code 1975, § 11-52-72, and that certain provisions of the 1986 ordinance had been enforced arbitrarily and capriciously, while other provisions were not enforced.
Pate later amended his complaint by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Olympia Spa v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- McCollum v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- City of Tuscaloosa v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Mobile v. WeinackerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- City of Mobile v. WeinackerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
- Duncan v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008