Legal Opinion

Richter v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 18, 1961No. 13586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This is an appeal by contestants from an adverse judgment in an election contest. The election was held under the provisions of the Texas Urban Renewal Law, Article 1269Z-3, Vernon’s Ann.Tex. Stats. Judgment of dismissal of the contest was rendered on the pleadings and stipulations, without trial on the merits.

The contestants based their appeal upon two points: (1) That the provisions of the statute “which restrict the privilege of voting in an urban renewal election to property owners who have duly rendered their property for taxation are unconstitutional, and this election…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Texas Public Utilities Corp. v. HollandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Caperton v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Campbell v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. DuBose v. AinsworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Royalty v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Montgomery Independent School District v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Royalty v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API