Legal Opinion

Department of Revenue v. Rakocy

Oregon Tax Court

Decided October 4, 2001No. TC 4504PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Senior Judge.

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Department of Revenue’s (the department) Motion for Reconsideration. The department appealed a magistrate decision allowing taxpayer’s claim for impairment-related work expenses. In the Regular Division, the matter was submitted on motions for summary judgment. That division held that the expenses were not impairment-related work expenses, but some did qualify as medical expenses and awarded taxpayer attorney fees. The department’s Motion for Reconsideration asserts that taxpayer does not meet either statutory or case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Brown v. ADULT & FAMILY SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Romani v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue v. WheelerOregon Tax Court · 2005
  2. Allen v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API