Department of Revenue v. Rakocy
Oregon Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARL N. BYERS, Senior Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Department of Revenue’s (the department) Motion for Reconsideration. The department appealed a magistrate decision allowing taxpayer’s claim for impairment-related work expenses. In the Regular Division, the matter was submitted on motions for summary judgment. That division held that the expenses were not impairment-related work expenses, but some did qualify as medical expenses and awarded taxpayer attorney fees. The department’s Motion for Reconsideration asserts that taxpayer does not meet either statutory or case…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Preble v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Brown v. ADULT & FAMILY SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Romani v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. WheelerOregon Tax Court · 2005
- Allen v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2004