Charles Ray Crawford v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Justice,
for the Court:
¶ 1. Charles Ray Crawford appeals from his 1993 conviction for rape, raising numerous assignments of error. The record is unclear as to what caused the delay in this case being heard on appeal. For this reason, we decided to set aside the procedural bar in this matter and consider the merits of Crawford’s claimed errors. Having carefully reviewed this record,'we have concluded that there is no merit, in any of Crawford’s assignments of error. ..Only four issues warrant discussion:
I. WHETHER THE TWENTY-ONE-YEAR DELAY IN THIS APPEAL VIOLATES CRAWFORD’S DUE PROCESS…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Charles Ray Crawford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- Charles Ray Crawford v. Earnest LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
- Crawford v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Crawford v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
- Jordan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.