Legal Opinion

Charles Ray Crawford v. State of Mississippi

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2015No. 2014-KA-00175-SCTPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PIERCE, Justice,

for the Court:

¶ 1. Charles Ray Crawford appeals from his 1993 conviction for rape, raising numerous assignments of error. The record is unclear as to what caused the delay in this case being heard on appeal. For this reason, we decided to set aside the procedural bar in this matter and consider the merits of Crawford’s claimed errors. Having carefully reviewed this record,'we have concluded that there is no merit, in any of Crawford’s assignments of error. ..Only four issues warrant discussion:

I. WHETHER THE TWENTY-ONE-YEAR DELAY IN THIS APPEAL VIOLATES CRAWFORD’S DUE PROCESS…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Charles Ray Crawford v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Charles Ray Crawford v. Earnest LeeMississippi Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Crawford v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  4. Crawford v. CainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  5. Jordan v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API