Legal Opinion

Jordan v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2018No. 2014–M–01731PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL K. RANDOLPH, PRESIDING JUSTICE FOR THE COURT

Now before the en banc Court is Montrell Jordan's Application for Leave to File Second Motion for Post-Conviction Relief. The State of Mississippi's response is also before us.

Jordan filed this, his second, application outside the three-year statute of limitations. He claims trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for three reasons.

First, Jordan says trial counsel's undisclosed romantic relationship with the State's chief investigator and key trial witness created an actual conflict of interest. Jordan raised this argument in his first…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Rowland v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Betty Lou Beets v. Wayne Scott, Director Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leslie Galloway, III a/k/a Leslie Galloway a/k/a Leslie "Bo" Galloway, III v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Leslie Galloway, III a/k/a Leslie Galloway a/k/a Leslie "Bo" Galloway, III v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API