Legal Opinion

East Asiatic Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 15, 1939No. C. D. 180Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States, arising at the port of Los Angeles, in which the plaintiff claims that the collector of customs erred in assessing additional duty at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under section 304 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on the ground that the merchandise was not legally marked at the time of importation.

It appears from the record that the goods herein involved consisted of copra meal shipped from Mexico and that, when the shipment was landed, the bags containing the meal did not bear any marks indicating the country of origin of their…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. United States v. Estate of BoshellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Kee Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. FieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. May Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API