Legal Opinion

In Re Mason

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided April 5, 1993No. Bankruptcy 93-10359PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ARTHUR N. VOTOLATO, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is the Debtor’s 1 Motion to Avoid Judicial Lien on garnished wages pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f), and the Objection of creditor G.E. Capital Corporation (“G.E. Capital”). On March 30, 1993, we held a telephonic conference in this matter during which the parties stipulated that the only item remaining in dispute is $663.43, representing wages garnished from August through November 1992. 2

The Debtor contends that our holding in In re Nunally, 103 B.R. 376 (Bankr.D.R.I.1989) supports her argument that garnished funds…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Ford (In Re Ford)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
  2. Nunally v. Barick Furniture Co. (In Re Nunally)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Preston v. GMPQ, LLC. (In Re Preston)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2008
  2. In Re HeerleinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API