Legal Opinion
United States v. Ford (In Re Ford)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 4, 1983No. 19-60153PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOEL PELOFSKY, Bankruptcy Judge.
Debtors seek turnover of funds garnished by the United States executing under a pre-petition judgment. The United States concedes that some of the funds were attached during the 90 days prior to filing, constitutes therefore a preferential transfer and should be returned to debtor. The dispute is as to the balance of the funds.
Debtors claim the balance of the garnished funds as exempt property and seek to avoid the garnishment under the provisions of § 522(f)(1) of the Code, which permits the debtor to avoid the fixing of a lien or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Whiting Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Cross Electric Company, Inc. v. United States of America, in Re Cross Electric Company, Inc., DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Vittert Construction & Investment Co. v. Wall Covering Contractors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- In Re GunderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
- Farrington v. O'Reilly Automotive Inc. (In Re TMIC Industrial Cleaning Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re BovaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- First Potter County Bank v. Hogg (In Re Hogg)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1983
- Nealis v. Ford Motor Credit Co. (In Re Nealis)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Thomas v. Beneficial of Missouri (In Re Thomas)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Nunally v. Barick Furniture Co. (In Re Nunally)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.