Legal Opinion

Rote v. Zel Custom Mfg., LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 12, 2019No. Case No: 2:13-cv-1189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge *781This once-complicated tort action now presents one main question: do the provisions of the Ohio Product Liability Act which impose liability on the "manufacturer" of a "product" apply to a foreign sovereign who manufactured ammunition for military use in 1982? The court finds that the ammunition falls outside the definition of a "product" under the OPLA because it was not manufactured for introduction into trade or commerce and was not intended for sale. Thus, the motion for summary judgment of defendant Dirección General de Fabricaciones…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reffitt v. Summit Treestands, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  2. Waldron v. BrownDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  3. Yates v. Royal Consumer Products, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API