Legal Opinion

Romine v. Cralle

California Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1890No. 13117PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Proceedings for contempt in disobeying an order of the Supreme Court staying execution upon a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Sonoma, appealed to this court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

J. — Several appeals have been taken in this case by the defendant Hirschler, one of which is still pending, the others having been dismissed. (Romine v. Cralle, 80 Cal. 626.)

On the twenty-fifth day of April, 1889, the attorney for said Hirschler filed in this court a petition for leave to file a stay-bond, and for an order of stay, in which it was alleged, in substance, that a bond had been given in the court below, but that for technical reasons the judge of that court had declined to receive the justification of the sureties or approve the bond. At the time this application was made, there…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Romine v. CralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Vernon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. In Re Jess Ex Rel. MorelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Mattos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. In Re BarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Shibley v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API