Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Cecil Nolan

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 15, 2017No. Appellate Case 2016-002497; Opinion 27704Published

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) and respondent have entered into an Agreement for Discipline by Consent (Agreement) pursuant to Rule 21 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). In the Agreement, respondent admits misconduct and consents to the imposition of an admonition or public reprimand. We accept the Agreement and issue a public reprimand. The facts, as set forth in the Agreement, are as follows.

Facts

Respondent is licensed to practice law in Arkansas.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re an Anonymous Member of the South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  2. In the Matter of an Anonymous Member of South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. In the Matter of WarnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API