Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Warner

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 11, 1985No. 22371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a disciplinary action charging Respondent with misconduct as defined in the Rules on Disciplinary Procedure. Specifically, he is charged with violation of DR 1-102 which provides that a lawyer shall not “engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.”

Both the Panel and Executive Committee, unanimously, found Respondent guilty of misconduct. We agree. The sanction of a private reprimand, recommended by the Panel, was raised by the Executive Committee to that of temporary suspension for one year.

The misconduct here relates to Respondent’s involvement and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. PlumbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. In the Matter of an Anonymous Member of South Carolina BarSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. In the Matter of Cecil NolanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Matter of Attorney General's PetitionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API