Legal Opinion

Harsha v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1933No. Docket No. 161, Calendar No. 37,094PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff, a citizen, resident, and taxpayer of the city of Detroit, a municipal corporation, by bill in equity for a declaratory decree and injunction, claims she is the holder of a bond of defendant city issued subject to the provisions of Act No. 279, Pub. Acts 1909 (see 1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 2228 et seq.), which limited the rate of taxation on the assessed value of the real and personal property in defendant city to 2 per cent, per annum, and limited the power of defendant city to borrow money on the credit of the city to 8 per cent, of the assessed valuation of the real and personal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Monroe v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Lahti v. FosterlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Malcolm v. City of East DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Rookledge v. GarwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. C. F. Smith Co. v. FitzgeraldMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API