Legal Opinion
Christopher Plumb v. Fluid Pump Service, Incorporated, Defendant-Cross-Claimantthird/party v. Star Marketing and Administration, Incorporated, Doing Business as Starmark, Trustmark Insurance Company and Time Insurance Company, Cross-Defendants-Appellees, and Starmark Trust and Christensen Key Financial, Incorporated, Third/party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 27, 1997No. 96-2688PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
124 F.3d 849
Christopher PLUMB, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
FLUID PUMP SERVICE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant-Cross-ClaimantThird/Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STAR MARKETING AND ADMINISTRATION, INCORPORATED, doing
business as Starmark, Trustmark Insurance Company
and Time Insurance Company,
Cross-Defendants-Appellees,
and
Starmark Trust and Christensen Key Financial, Incorporated,
Third/Party Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-2688.
United States Court of Appeals,
Seventh Circuit.
Argued April 3, 1997.
Decided Aug. 27, 1997.
Danny L. Worker, Worker & Power, Fred R. Harbecke (argued), Chicago, IL, Robert A. Gornik, Wrobel &…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Analytical Surveys, Inc. v. Intercare Health Plans, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000