Legal Opinion

Linde Enterprises, Inc. v. Prevailing Wage Appeals Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Pursuant to Section 5 of the Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Act (Act), all workmen employed on a “public work” project shall be paid “not less than the prevailing minimum wages.” Act of August 15,1961, P.L. 987, as amended, 43 P.S. § 165-5.1 In this ease, *311after receiving an allegation that the contractor that had been awarded the contract for the 1989 Exeter Borough Sanitary Sewer Improvements Project (“Exeter Project”) had violated the Act by falling to pay its workmen the prevailing minimum wage rates, the Acting Secretary of Labor and Industry (Secretary)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. CROSBY BY CROSBY v. SultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. York Excavating Co. v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. All-Weld, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. A. R. Scalise Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. 302 Chelten, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dilucente Corp. v. Pennsylvania Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Worth & Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Adams County Interfaith Housing Corp. v. Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Adams County Interfaith Housing Corp. v. Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Worth & Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API