Legal Opinion

Brigham Young University v. Pfizer, Inc.

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 28, 2009No. 2:06-CV-890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

BROOKE WELLS, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs Brigham Young University and Dr. Daniel Simmons (collectively BYU) have filed a motion for sanctions concerning discovery under Federal Rule 37(b) against Defendant Pfizer, Incorporated et al. BYU asks this Court to enter the following sanctions: (1) striking Pfizer’s Answer; (2) ordering Pfizer to pay BYU’s costs and fees associated in “discovering Pfizer’s discovery abuses;”1 (3) “entering a spoliation instruction that all the documents Pfizer has destroyed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  5. Chavez v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Pfizer Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  2. City of Las Cruces v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
  3. Entrata v. Yardi SystemsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2019
  4. Kodiak Cakes v. JRM NutrasciencesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
  5. Prisbrey v. State Auto Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API