Legal Opinion

Moore v. Moore

California Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1900No. Sac. No. 678PublishedCited by 21 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

The appeal is from the judgment. The prayer of the complaint is that defendant be decreed to hold the legal title to certain land in trust for plaintiff. The material allegations of the complaint are: That plaintiff was in the possession and occupation of public land of the United States, which land was subject to homestead entry. Plaintiff was qualified to enter the land under the homestead laws, and was entitled upon so doing, and after compliance with the laws of the United States, to obtain title thereto. His son, Charles W. Moore, lived with him upon the land. In 1873, without the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Loving & Evans v. BlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Tri-Q, Inc. v. Sta-Hi Corp.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Northen v. ElledgeArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Holm v. BramwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API