Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 28, 1992No. 4-91-0432PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

This appeal presents the issue of whether the State may call a defendant to testify at a probation revocation hearing to elicit testimony which would show that defendant had violated conditions of his probation but which would not incriminate him in any other proceedings. We hold that the State may do so.

I. Facts

In January 1989, defendant, Gary Martin, pleaded guilty to driving while under the influence of alcohol and driving while his driver’s license was suspended (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 95½, pars. 11—501(a)(2), 6—303(a)). In July 1989, the trial court sentenced defendant to one year’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Ferguson v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. People v. FlattIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. People v. DavisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. LindseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. SwankAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. BellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. People v. NeckopulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. People v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API