Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Perry
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 2013No. DA 11-0704PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 Appellant Karen Jane Perry (Karen) appeals the Fourth Judicial District Court’s order denying her request to disqualify and enjoin attorney Gail H. Goheen (Goheen) from representing Appellee Terance Patrick Perry (Terance) in this proceeding. We affirm and address the following issues:
¶2 1. Did the District Court err by denying Karen’s motion to
disqualify Goheen as counsel for Terance pursuant to Rule 1.20 of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct?
¶3 2. Did Goheen violate her duty to Karen under Rule 1.9 of the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct?
¶4 3. Did the District Court err by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Trone v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Smithson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
- In Re the Marriage of McMahonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Leichtfuss v. DabneyMontana Supreme Court · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stock v. MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Keuffer v. O.F. Mossberg & Sons, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
- Burke v. OsnessDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2019
- James Lee Construction, Inc. v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Keuffer v. O.F. Mossberg & Sons, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.