Legal Opinion
Kraftco Corporation v. Beatrice Foods Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 3, 1971No. Civ. A. 485-68PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
WORTENDYKE, District Judge:
This case was tried before the Court without a jury and pursuant to Rule 52 F.R.Civ.P. ; 1 this Court is undertaking herein to make the required findings of fact and conclusions of law.
It must be noted, however, that this case is by no means an ordinary one. The technology of the art relative to the patent in suit is founded upon organic chemistry. An apt description of the nature and scope of the complexity of the instant ease is found in plaintiff’s proposed findings of fact in the following language:
“The trial of this suit…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Admiral Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wagoner v. BargerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
- Azoplate Corporation v. Silverlith, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- ADM Corp. v. Speedmaster Packaging Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1974
- Allen Archery, Inc. v. Jennings Compound Bow, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.