Legal Opinion
City of Lansing v. Hartsuff
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1995No. Docket 163095PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Defendants appeal by leave granted an order of the circuit court affirming defendants’ convictions following a jury trial in the 54-A District Court. Defendant Roger Hartsuif was convicted of disturbing the public peace and quiet by loud or boisterous conduct in a public place, Lansing Ordinances, § 664.01, and hindering, opposing, obstructing, or resisting a police officer in the performance of his duties, Lansing Ordinances, § 602.02. Defendant Timothy Hartsuif was convicted of the latter charge only. Both defendants were sentenced to six months of probation, fourteen days in jail, and a…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kefgen v. DavidsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Joerger v. Gordon Food Service, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bachman v. Swan Harbour AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hackel v. Macomb County CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.