Legal Opinion

Routledge v. Schmitt

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1938No. 6 Div. 190PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

This appeal is by the defendant in the court below from the judgment of the court setting aside, upon plaintiff’s (appellee’s) motion, the verdict of the jury (and the judgment rendered thereon) in her favor, in a suit by her against appellant, for damages alleged to have been suffered by appellee, in a collision between the car in which she was riding and one driven by appellant.

Upon such an appeal, it is true enough, as conceded by all concerned, the verdict of the jury having gone in appellee’s favor, and thereby established her right to recover, she could not complain, upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Daniel v. MotesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Law v. SaksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Lafarge North America, Inc. v. NordSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Birmingham Electric Co. v. BaileyAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Routledge v. SchmittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API