Legal Opinion

Santiago Moran-Enriquez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 29, 1989No. 86-7739, 89-70010PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:

INS regulations require that an alien in a deportation hearing who appears to be eligible for relief from deportation be so advised by the Immigration Judge. We consider whether the record here contained enough evidence of petitioner Santiago Moran-Enriquez’s eligibility for relief to trigger this requirement.

Facts

Moran was lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence on October 15, 1979, as an immediate relative of a United States citizen. While still on permanent resident status, he was convicted in Arizona of two crimes involving moral turpitude.1…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurn Bu Roe v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Jose Guadalupe Barraza-LeonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Leonillo Duran and Shirley Duran v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Juan Mario Arrieta, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Juan Manuel Muro-InclanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Musibau Hassan v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Isaac RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Gil Leon-PazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API