Legal Opinion

Austin v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 2, 2022No. 1:18-cv-07268Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT A. AUSTIN, Plaintiff, No. 18 C 07268 v. Judge Thomas M. Durkin CITY OF CHICAGO, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on several motions filed by the Defendants in response to continued non-cooperation in discovery by the Plaintiff. The Court now issues the following rulings: Defendants’ motion to compel, R. 169, is granted in part. Defendants’ third motion to compel, R. 193, is granted in part. Defendants’ motion for a protective order, R. 186, is granted.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. KasuboskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Burns v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1970
  3. Budget Rent-A-Car of Missouri, Inc. v. Hertz Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1972
  4. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Nutmeg Group, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API