Munden v. Kansas City, Mo.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The following parts of the opinion written by Judge BLAND, upon the original submission of the cause, are adopted by the court:
"This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $3784. Defendant has appealed.
The facts show that on December 30, 1923, plaintiff was driving his automobile eastwardly over the Twenty-third Street Viaduct in Kansas City; that when he came to the end of the viaduct and was about to turn southward upon Brook street he ran into a hole causing him to lose control of his car. Thereafter the car ran over the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wiggin v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Burke Ex Rel. Burke v. PappasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Phillips v. BartonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
- Heigold v. United Railways CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- Bachman v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drake Ex Rel. Imes v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Martin v. GilmoreMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Metz v. Kansas City, Mo.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1935
- Brinkley v. United Biscuit Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Proctor v. RuppertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.